<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Search for the Bushido in George W.&#160;Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soulshelter.com/prosperity/my-search-for-the-bushido-in-george-w-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/prosperity/my-search-for-the-bushido-in-george-w-bush/</link>
	<description>Live. Work. Thrive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:59:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: by Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/prosperity/my-search-for-the-bushido-in-george-w-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>by Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/02/07/my-search-for-the-bushido-in-george-w-bush/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Good picking, Chris. Your statement is indeed more accurate (if somewhat less snappy for a self-help tome).

BTW, you will find plenty of history and Japan buffs who will take great exception to Bushido as expounded by Nitobe, citing the book&#039;s lack of historical accuracy, etc.

But I think books can hold great truths even if they aren&#039;t entirely &quot;accurate.&quot; Are the Koran, the Bhagavad-Gita, and the Bible &quot;accurate&quot;? Maybe not, but they hold great truths—and more important, they&#039;re incredibly useful for a billion people (not that I put Bushido in the same class).

Thanks for the on-target observation! Now I&#039;m going to give him the Japan stuff a rest for awhile ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good picking, Chris. Your statement is indeed more accurate (if somewhat less snappy for a self-help tome).</p>
<p>BTW, you will find plenty of history and Japan buffs who will take great exception to Bushido as expounded by Nitobe, citing the book&#8217;s lack of historical accuracy, etc.</p>
<p>But I think books can hold great truths even if they aren&#8217;t entirely &#8220;accurate.&#8221; Are the Koran, the Bhagavad-Gita, and the Bible &#8220;accurate&#8221;? Maybe not, but they hold great truths—and more important, they&#8217;re incredibly useful for a billion people (not that I put Bushido in the same class).</p>
<p>Thanks for the on-target observation! Now I&#8217;m going to give him the Japan stuff a rest for awhile &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/prosperity/my-search-for-the-bushido-in-george-w-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/02/07/my-search-for-the-bushido-in-george-w-bush/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed the post. Wanted to pick a nit with one statement you made. 

&quot;When a leader has failed, only his replacement can restore an organization’s credibility.&quot;

This is a non sequitur. Leaders are human and humans by definition make mistakes. We can&#039;t expect perfection in our leaders... well, we can, but we&#039;ll guarantee that our expectations cannot be met. 

The eight virtues you cite don&#039;t include perfection among them. They provide a framework for making decisions (things to consider while choosing a course of action) and we as a society generally subscribe to the idea that decisions made out of this virtuous framework will at least be right-intentioned if not right. 

I think this might be more accurate:
When a person in a position of leadership has shown that they cannot or will not lead, only his replacement can restore an organization&#039;s credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed the post. Wanted to pick a nit with one statement you made. </p>
<p>&#8220;When a leader has failed, only his replacement can restore an organization’s credibility.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a non sequitur. Leaders are human and humans by definition make mistakes. We can&#8217;t expect perfection in our leaders&#8230; well, we can, but we&#8217;ll guarantee that our expectations cannot be met. </p>
<p>The eight virtues you cite don&#8217;t include perfection among them. They provide a framework for making decisions (things to consider while choosing a course of action) and we as a society generally subscribe to the idea that decisions made out of this virtuous framework will at least be right-intentioned if not right. </p>
<p>I think this might be more accurate:<br />
When a person in a position of leadership has shown that they cannot or will not lead, only his replacement can restore an organization&#8217;s credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

