<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Way to Protect Your Soul in a Wired&#160;Age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/</link>
	<description>Live. Work. Thrive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:59:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/11/05/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>There is time for everything. Time to hand write, time to meet face-to-face, time to talk via phone, and time to text message or email.  Each has its own advantages and disadvantages but a problem arises when we prefer one or two means of communication 99% of the time. This article actually hit home for me. My husband thinks I am weird and rude when someone left a voicemail then I would reply via email or text message.  I prefer to interact with strangers I meet in a discussion board or a thread than to talk on the phone.  I know..I am weird and I had always wondered why until now...Soulshelter has solved the riddle.  Thank you for insightful perspectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is time for everything. Time to hand write, time to meet face-to-face, time to talk via phone, and time to text message or email.  Each has its own advantages and disadvantages but a problem arises when we prefer one or two means of communication 99% of the time. This article actually hit home for me. My husband thinks I am weird and rude when someone left a voicemail then I would reply via email or text message.  I prefer to interact with strangers I meet in a discussion board or a thread than to talk on the phone.  I know..I am weird and I had always wondered why until now&#8230;Soulshelter has solved the riddle.  Thank you for insightful perspectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Masters</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>David Masters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/11/05/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Thatguy,

I was thinking the same thing whilst I was reading this - what about letters?  Haven&#039;t they been around for hundreds if not thousands of years?

However, I also think that letters convey a sense of presence.  You are holding something that was held in the other person&#039;s had.  The physicality of handwriting, of engaging with the other person&#039;s creativity, is impossible to avoid.

Beautifully creative acts shared online do allow us to fully engage with other people.

It is wonderful that so many people have a voice online.  But it also means that anyone can type anything without having to wonder if they are really being creative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thatguy,</p>
<p>I was thinking the same thing whilst I was reading this &#8211; what about letters?  Haven&#8217;t they been around for hundreds if not thousands of years?</p>
<p>However, I also think that letters convey a sense of presence.  You are holding something that was held in the other person&#8217;s had.  The physicality of handwriting, of engaging with the other person&#8217;s creativity, is impossible to avoid.</p>
<p>Beautifully creative acts shared online do allow us to fully engage with other people.</p>
<p>It is wonderful that so many people have a voice online.  But it also means that anyone can type anything without having to wonder if they are really being creative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: by Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>by Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/11/05/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/#comment-896</guid>
		<description>@ All: Thanks for the terrific pushback. Sometimes I wonder whether I just &quot;don&#039;t get&quot; new media (my wife would say so when she sees me struggling with certain newer computer applications).

But having worked in the Internet professional services field from 1994 through a good part of 2003, I know that I actually &lt;em&gt;do &lt;/em&gt;get it (at least most of it). I just find it dehumanizing. And, as you rightly note, empowering for some people—maybe even most. And certainly inevitable … Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ All: Thanks for the terrific pushback. Sometimes I wonder whether I just &#8220;don&#8217;t get&#8221; new media (my wife would say so when she sees me struggling with certain newer computer applications).</p>
<p>But having worked in the Internet professional services field from 1994 through a good part of 2003, I know that I actually <em>do </em>get it (at least most of it). I just find it dehumanizing. And, as you rightly note, empowering for some people—maybe even most. And certainly inevitable … Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/11/05/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/#comment-895</guid>
		<description>A lot of what you wrote about email can be said about mail. Letter writing has been around for a very long time and in many cases contributed greatly to the world. 

In general, most people are meek, timid, and at times fearful of being called out. When one reads about his character flaws via written communication, it is easier to not be offended and take the advice to heart. The beauty of writing is that I can read it, think then respond. Sadly for me and for many others it just does not work like that when we communicate face to face.

-ThatGuy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of what you wrote about email can be said about mail. Letter writing has been around for a very long time and in many cases contributed greatly to the world. </p>
<p>In general, most people are meek, timid, and at times fearful of being called out. When one reads about his character flaws via written communication, it is easier to not be offended and take the advice to heart. The beauty of writing is that I can read it, think then respond. Sadly for me and for many others it just does not work like that when we communicate face to face.</p>
<p>-ThatGuy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/11/05/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/#comment-894</guid>
		<description>I think there is and has always been a tendency for people outside of a movement to condemn it and be unwilling to acknowledge the benefits.  While I am more in between, having only had computers around for about half of my life, I still see this change as not only necessary but also beneficial.

We are not losing the fact that we are social creatures.  Now we are just adapting the way we interact.  Since the average person is exposed to more information in a year than some people were exposed in their entire lifetime 100 years ago, we need a way to process it and move through it quickly.  We accomplish this by cutting out the fat.  Instead of having long conversations with people who enjoy the sound of their voice more than passing value to others, we ask for a short response containing the information we need so that we can move on to the next task.  Is that wrong?

While it may sound nice to approach everything with a lackadaisical effort and move at whatever pace you want, the world is moving at its own pace.  I am young enough to have the energy to move with it and help shape the direction.  While I still have that chance, I am going to embrace it.  The only way to do this is to leverage the benefits of technology, not forsake them in order to cling to old ideals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is and has always been a tendency for people outside of a movement to condemn it and be unwilling to acknowledge the benefits.  While I am more in between, having only had computers around for about half of my life, I still see this change as not only necessary but also beneficial.</p>
<p>We are not losing the fact that we are social creatures.  Now we are just adapting the way we interact.  Since the average person is exposed to more information in a year than some people were exposed in their entire lifetime 100 years ago, we need a way to process it and move through it quickly.  We accomplish this by cutting out the fat.  Instead of having long conversations with people who enjoy the sound of their voice more than passing value to others, we ask for a short response containing the information we need so that we can move on to the next task.  Is that wrong?</p>
<p>While it may sound nice to approach everything with a lackadaisical effort and move at whatever pace you want, the world is moving at its own pace.  I am young enough to have the energy to move with it and help shape the direction.  While I still have that chance, I am going to embrace it.  The only way to do this is to leverage the benefits of technology, not forsake them in order to cling to old ideals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Witwicki</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Witwicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/11/05/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/#comment-893</guid>
		<description>I find that I hate using the phone too and I would likely have not called in the above situation despite being old enough to have grown up without the internet. Personally, I just find the phone to be an ineffective means of communication. I believe I can communicate better either via email or, when temporal simultaneity is required, face-to-face.

Now, having said that, I agree that there is a problem with people today refusing to have some sort of simultaneity model for communication. There are times when you need the instant feedback to communicate effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that I hate using the phone too and I would likely have not called in the above situation despite being old enough to have grown up without the internet. Personally, I just find the phone to be an ineffective means of communication. I believe I can communicate better either via email or, when temporal simultaneity is required, face-to-face.</p>
<p>Now, having said that, I agree that there is a problem with people today refusing to have some sort of simultaneity model for communication. There are times when you need the instant feedback to communicate effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.soulshelter.com/clark%e2%80%99s-rules/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/comment-page-1/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soulshelter.com/2008/11/05/one-way-to-protect-your-soul-in-a-wired-age/#comment-892</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I&#039;m old enough to have grown up with no Internet, when even the telephone was much less ever-present. It used to cost money to call anybody more than a few miles away from home - that was the ancient time long before cell phones, when you rented your phone (singular) from the phone company and in small town America where I lived) party lines were the norm. Still, I&#039;m very fond of EAT in some cases. I used to refer to it as the desire to keep some people at modem&#039;s length. For me, it comes down to the desire to define my personal space. LD Brandeis once said: &quot;The most comprehensive of rights, and the right most valued by civilized men - The right to be alone.&quot; Maybe I&#039;m just in the wrong circle of people, but I find much of what passes for meaningful social interaction to be noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;m old enough to have grown up with no Internet, when even the telephone was much less ever-present. It used to cost money to call anybody more than a few miles away from home &#8211; that was the ancient time long before cell phones, when you rented your phone (singular) from the phone company and in small town America where I lived) party lines were the norm. Still, I&#8217;m very fond of EAT in some cases. I used to refer to it as the desire to keep some people at modem&#8217;s length. For me, it comes down to the desire to define my personal space. LD Brandeis once said: &#8220;The most comprehensive of rights, and the right most valued by civilized men &#8211; The right to be alone.&#8221; Maybe I&#8217;m just in the wrong circle of people, but I find much of what passes for meaningful social interaction to be noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

