(The following is a post from Sara, author of the always thoughtful blog, On Simplicity. We quite like Sara’s practical and life-affirming approach to the complexities of hyper-material modern existence, and we’re sure our loyal readers will too.)

simplicity_yellowwall_pshrink35.JPGA while back at my blog, I asked my readers for their definitions of simplicity. Many included the importance of having less, but enjoying more. When it comes to actually giving stuff up, though, it can be easier said than done. In that spirit, here are five ways you can make it easy to enjoy a life with less stuff.

1. Use what you do have.

Go through your music collection and make a playlist of forgotten favorites. (I love doing this!) Pull a favorite book off the shelf and give it another read. Pull a passed-down antique out of the closet and give it a place of honor. Using and enjoying what you do have gives you a feeling of abundance that’s incredibly uplifting.

2. Keep a list of free and fun things to do.

You could take a photography walk, teach the dog a new trick, snuggle with a loved one, incite a family wrestling match, write bad rhyming poetry, take a nap, or dance to the radio. The more items you can dream up, the more fun you have at your fingertips.

3. Start seeing empty spaces as packed with freedom.

Celebrate every empty shelf, bare wall, and exposed square foot of flooring as the ultimate victory. If freedom equals happiness (or at least a big component of it), then not having something just brings you closer to your personal nirvana.

4. Engage all five senses.

Don’t just put on your shirt in the morning. Take a second to feel the weave, to take in the color, to smell the freshness (it is clean, isn’t it?). Okay, you don’t have to taste it, but you’re starting to get the idea. Same with your food. Don’t just eat it; savor the smells and sights of a delicious meal. By packing the mundane with meaning, we create a luxurious lifestyle out of nothing at all.

simplicity_sparseapartment_pshrink40.JPG5. Make a list of the things you get in return when give things up.

My list includes freedom, peacefulness, and room to think. Keep the list at the bottom of sock drawer and reference as needed. It’s a powerful reminder of exactly why I’m not filling my drawers with endless new things.

You might also enjoy:

Simplify, Simplify

On Moderation

What We Really Need to be Happy

Subscribe to Soul Shelter

thoreau-face_paint_shrink.jpg“The laborer’s day ends with the going down of the sun, and he is then free to devote himself to his chosen pursuit, independent of his labor; but his employer, who speculates from month to month, has no respite from one end of the year to the other.” Thoreau

Several months ago I wrote about something I hadn’t done in nearly 20 years: Apply for a job. In that post, I promised an update on what happened. Here’s what I’d planned to write:

“I was offered the job, and I accepted it …

Now, you may well wonder why a successful company seller and teacher of entrepreneurship would, in the midst of writing a three-month thread exhorting others to go solo or become more entrepreneurial in their work lives, would suddenly become a university employee.

Let me explain.

First, this job is all about my lifework over the past 24 years. Never has a job seem to so well-suited to my interests and skills.

Second, I wanted to reengage in a community. For the past five years I’ve been writing, teaching, investing, and working on a new publishing-related venture. But aside from the periodic bursts of interaction each new class brings, these activities involve working either alone or with one, or occasionally two, other people. I like working solo, but I’m no hermit. I miss the community of thecommunity.jpg workplace. I love the work-at home-or coffee-shop work style, but I’m also feeling the need to be part of a larger community—and to have a place with my name on the door, where I can go to be part of something bigger, and where I can help others.

Third, my work is computer- and data-intensive, and can be done just about anywhere quiet where one can think, write, research, or compute. That’s fine, but it means I work a lot from home, library, and coffee shops, and tend to exercise the same skills over and over. I want to go to a place that requires new and different behaviors, where colleagues are available for face-to-face chats—and where my name’s on the door (or at least a mailbox).

Fourth, it’s a half-time job, so it leaves room for doctoral studies and my venture, which fortunately is something I can work on rather than in. Teachers should be practitioners, and I want to keep practicing. But the experience of applying, interviewing for, and accepting this job has renewed my appreciation for salaried employment.

Which is a good thing, because let’s face it: Most people are better off working as salaried employees rather than entrepreneurs.

A company is a community, and we all need community. Being a solo or small businessperson can be lonely and socially isolating (I think the most satisfied entrepreneurs are those who succeed in building companies big enough to become true work communities). Telecommuting or otherwise working alone sounds like a dream to those stuck in cubicles, but there’s a dark side, too (see reader Sarah’s Five Ways to turn Telecommuting into a Nightmare for a hilarious but provocative take on the work-at-home lifestyle).

Financially, too, it’s tough to beat a steady income for building wealth. While entrepreneurship can lead to outsized rewards, slow and steady saving and investing is the most reliable path to prosperity for most workers. Ignore financial news and sock away as much salary as you can.

A salaried job provides emotional stability along with financial security. The truth is that most people are happier and better off being employees. A workplace provides community, a belonging-place, camaraderie. At worst, it’s a place to commiserate with coworkers; at best, a place where lifelong friendships grow …”

paystub.jpgBut! as I wrote back in Paragraph One, all this is what I had planned to write. Here’s what actually happened.

I didn’t get the job.

Though I became one of three finalists, another candidate received and accepted the offer.

I was disappointed. I’d been confident of success, and had good reason to be so. Nevertheless, I had to face a bitter lesson life teaches over and over again: There’s always someone smarter, stronger, and more qualified.

So I’ll remain self-employed, and trod steadily toward my goal of becoming a half-time, salaried university professor. And in the meantime, I’ll continue to sing the praises of both entrepreneurship and salaried employment.

You may also enjoy:

Changing Scenes with the Law of Requisite Variety

Born Ready

Dogs & Dolphins

Subscribe to Soul Shelter

dream_door_pshrink40.JPG“When I do [my] first draft, I shut the lights off and pull a stocking cap over my head and eyes, and I’m typing blind. It’s the old paradox that you see by blinding yourself.” – Novelist Kent Haruf

I’ve heard lots of different writers tossing around a particular little quote. I’m not sure who first said it, but it’s been variously attributed to Joan Didion, W.H. Auden, and Saul Bellow. Here it is:

I don’t know what I think until I see what I say.

Writers cherish this epigram because it gets to the mysterious heart of the creative process. Often we sit down to our work at a loss for ideas. We find, at such moments, that we must relinquish control, step back, and welcome the surprise of whatever comes through.

Whether you’re a painter, songwriter, or creative thinker of any kind, your process of creation will be the same in one important respect: it will require surrender.

Surrender to what? Oh, to the uncontrollably slow, fabulous percolations of imagination, surrender_littleboy_pshrink40.JPGmemory, mind, soul — or, in strictly psychological terms, surrender to the untraceable workings of the unconscious.

Because I’m chest-deep in labor on a new book now, I muse upon these matters daily. The unconscious is a rascal, but I’d be lost if I didn’t surrender and let it do it’s rascally thing.

I love this passage from Annie Dillard’s darkly whimsical volume, The Writing Life:

On plenty of days the writer can write three or four pages, and on plenty of other days he concludes he must throw them away. These truths comfort the anguished. …Most writers might well stop berating themselves for writing at a normal, slow pace. Octavio Paz cites the example of ‘Saint-Rol Roux, who used to hang the inscription, The Poet is Working, from his door while he slept.’

For all of us it’s true: we do much of our work while lying asleep — or while standing in the shower, or sitting behind the wheel en route to our day-jobs. Always, little cogs keep silently turning. Some rich mineral water seeps up through the strata to surface as a glimmering idea.

Ernest Hemingway famously described his working method as a revving-up of his subconscious. As soon as heard the engine’s purr he stopped working and let it run on its own. So, paradoxically, when he left his desk his real work got started.

I always worked until I had something done, and I always stopped when I knew what was going to happen next. That way I could be sure of going on the next day. …I learned not to think about anything I was writing from the time I stopped writing until I started again the next day. That way my subconscious would be working on it and at the same time I would be listening to other people and noticing everything, I hoped; learning, I hoped; and I would read so that I would not think about my work and make myself impotent to do it.

One must go to the desk, of course, and regularly; nothing will happen if one doesn’t. A regimen is important because it primes the pump. But just as important is surrendering one’s conscious efforts, letting the spout at the back of the mind burble free.

These words of Andre Dubus, one of the twentieth century’s greatest short story writers, remind me that not thinking about one’s work, like Hemingway, is a discipline as indispensable as going to the desk in the first place.

I gestate: for months, often for years. An idea comes to me from wherever they come, and I write it in a notebook. Sometimes I forget it’s there. I don’t think about it. By think I mean plan. I try never to think about where a story will go. This is as hard as writing, maybe harder; I spend most of my waking time doing it; it is hard work, because I want to know what the story will do and how it will end and whether or not I can write it; but I must not know, or I will kill the story by controlling it; I work to surrender.

“Art is long,” wrote Henry James. “If we work for ourselves of course we must hurry. Ifstillness_womanonjetty_pshrink35.JPG we work for her we must often pause.”

Indeed, one must be patient. One must surrender to the slow fruition of thought, image, ideas. Rilke called this “being inactive with confidence.”

And if we reflect, we see that this practice applies to many aspects of life. Essentially, it’s the practice of faith. Surrender, stillness, and trust: all are religious disciplines. T.S. Eliot talks about this religious quality of creativity, and even equates one’s creative actions with one’s destiny:

Some men have had a deep conviction of their destiny, and in that conviction have prospered; but when they cease to act as an instrument, and think of themselves as the active source of what they do, their pride is punished by disaster. …The concept of destiny leaves us with a mystery, but it is a mystery not contrary to reason, for it implies that the world, and the course of human history, have meaning.

Stalled as it may seem at times, our work has a meaning and an order. If we care about what we do, if it is real to us, and if we approach it with discipline and surrender, it will germinate night and day — and cannot fail to blossom and surprise us.

You might also enjoy:

Unleashing Ideas: A Fourfold Approach

Nourishing the Creative Impulse

Poverty, the Pulitzer, & the Beauty of Letting Go

Subscribe to Soul Shelter

mark_fritz.jpgMy London-based buddy Mark Fritz is turning into a bona fide business self-help guru.

I’m glad, because I personally witnessed Mark’s effectiveness on the job at the same Dilbert-sized company for two years. During our time together, he flourished while I struggled (the experience taught me, among other things, that competence is a function of fit between the person and an organization, not something inborn and unchangeable—but that’s another post for another time).

Since then, Mark’s worked all over the world: Japan, Singapore, Egypt, London, Holland, the U.K., and Italy. Mark’s no armchair guru; he’s successfully accomplished hundreds of difficult projects, while effectively managing and mentoring difficult people—both superstars and underperformers.

But what really knocks me out is his unshakable good cheer and humor. I’ve never met anyone who maintains such consistently high spirits amid situations that would crush the life from ordinary employees.

Now Mark has a couple of books out. The first one, called Time to Get Started, carried an intriguing paragraph entitled “Power of a Committed Decision.” Here’s my synopsis:

There is nothing more powerful in the world than a committed decision. Many people think they are making decisions, but unless there is a powerful commitment behind those decisions, they are not decisions, but preferences. Add the commitment to ensure your decisions are real decisions—not preferences.

“I always understood the power of a committed decision,” says Mark, “mostly because I’ve seen so many uncommitted decisions in corporate life! But three years ago, the true power of a committed decision became visible to me with my personal ‘committed decision’ to create a unique daily thought for my Web site.

“Now, creating a unique thought for each day would definitely take commitment, and I also knew I would need the motivation to start and the discipline to keep it up. What I needed were the two ingredients of a committed decision: 1) a “Why” to generate motivation, and 2) a ‘No Alternative’ to create the discipline to follow through.yes_no_dice.jpg

“The ‘Why?’ was built by viewing the sum of my daily thoughts (over many years) as my legacy—something I can leave behind when I leave this world. This made the “Why” a powerful reason to act. Second, I needed the discipline to make sure I would do it on a daily basis and not miss a single day. This is where “No Alternative” became important. I began to make the daily thoughts more visible by sending an e-mail of the past week’s material to people who found it interesting to read. This way, I had “No Alternative” but to keep it up—or disappoint readers.”

So, if like me, you sometimes find yourself wondering why your decisions, well … don’t actually decide anything, give Mark’s advice a try. And make this year’s decisions stick.

You may also enjoy:

Daunting Task? Learn to Whip It

Three Questions Seekers Must Ask Themselves

Trust Thyself

Subscribe to Soul Shelter

oops_pshrink35.JPGIn my school days I was the painfully reticent kid in the back of the class who paid attention, behaved himself, and made the honor roll every quarter, but would never ever raise his hand or volunteer to speak in front of the other kids. When called upon I would either turn catatonic or talk with a doubt-ridden quiver.

Partly it was natural shyness that paralyzed me. Yet in school theater productions I strutted the stage without fear, happily performing to packed auditoriums. What accounted for my contradictory nature? Simple. While acting in a play, I could rely upon a script. I didn’t have to venture my own thoughts or guesses. Speaking in class, however, I risked saying something silly or giving the wrong answer. In class, I was vulnerable to mistakes — and mistakes are a shameful thing. Or so we’re led to believe.

Ours is a success-or-failure culture. We covet seemingly flawless wins, and avoid at all costs missteps, goofs, or even well-intentioned blunders. As Ralph Waldo Emerson observed back in 1841:

If our young men miscarry in their first enterprises, they lose all heart. If the young merchant fails, men say he is ruined. If the finest genius studies at one of our colleges, and is not installed in an office within one year afterwards in the cities or suburbs of Boston or New York, it seems to his friends and to himself that he is right in being disheartened, and in complaining the rest of his life.

Success — early, gracefully, and infallibly achieved — is the main idea; God help us if we cannot leap clear over all errors to attain it. We learn these attitudes early: Answer right and go to the front of the class. Ace the test and advance to the top of the grade-sheet. Make no mistakes and excel. But err and you will fail to advance — or fail, period.scoldingnerd_pshrink40.JPG

Absurd, of course. Human beings cannot learn without making mistakes. We ought to know this, even in youth. The old cliché, Nothing ventured nothing gained, dances in our brains from an early age — yes, but being a cliché it fails to penetrate. And so throughout our lives we must teach and re-teach ourselves that mistakes are natural and even useful – not shameful.

Personally, the realities of adulthood re-teach me this lesson often — as does my writing process, which necessitates engaging mistakes and building successes upon them.

In the wonderful book The Conversations, legendary film editor Walter Murch puts it beautifully:

Truly great lessons can be learned from work that fails, but failure is stamped on the product and there’s a tendency to think everything you did was wrong, and you vow not to go there again. You have to resist this impulse, just as you have to resist the syrupy entanglements of success. These are, almost, religious issues. What the world thinks is success, what it rewards, has sometimes very little to do with the essential content of the work and how it relates to the author and his own development.

Like Emerson, Murch speaks here to our success-or-failure culture, but with different nuance. We tend not to credit the value — indeed the necessity — of the mistake, the attempt, the unprofitable or impractical venture, and consequently we often do not understand the real nature of success when we see it.

In his wonderful book Blue Highways William Least-Heat Moon notes:

The annals of scientific discovery are full of errors that opened new worlds: Bell was working on an apparatus to aid the deaf when he invented the telephone; Edison was tinkering with the telephone when he invented the phonograph. If a man can keep alert and imaginative, an error is a possibility, a chance at something new; to him, wandering and wondering are part of the same process, and he is most mistaken, most in error, whenever he quits exploring.

Thomas Edison faced many a doomed venture, including a scheme to build houses ofwhiteout_pshrink35.JPG poured concrete all over America. I recently heard it said, however, that his outlook was always: I never fail, I just find out a thousand ways that something doesn’t work.

My poet Rilke puts it more boldly: “The point of life is to fail at greater and greater things.”

I can’t help feeling Rilke is right. Meditating upon the subject long enough, I begin to see that worthy mistakes — and not easy successes — are in fact what life is all about. What a freeing thought!

The writer Paul Zweig wrote, “Making our wish, we make ourselves. We exist in the time between the wish and its fulfillment.” For today’s post I paraphrase Zweig thusly:

Making our attempt, we make ourselves. We exist in the time between the attempt and the attainment.

So throw off timidity, young person at school, and raise your hand! It’s your mistakes that will lead you to the front of the class. Onward through worthy errors. Fail, grow, live, and keep on venturing.

You might also enjoy:

Measures of Success

You’ve Got to Jump

Redefining Rejection

Subscribe to Soul Shelter

crabs.jpgSeventeen days without touching a computer, cell phone, or television did me a world of good. And when I got back, those days taught me what’s wrong with my desk.

I was vacationing on Orcas Island, part of the San Juan Island group between Canada and Washington State. There I pursued manly activities such as fishing, chopping wood, boating, hiking, swimming, and lighting woodstove fires. The copy of Wired magazine I brought lay unread in my shoulder bag, which remained unopened (what was I thinking?). Amid the Orcas Island landscapes and the Puget Sound seascapes—Dall porpoises, harbor seals, soaring trees, boats, dogs, fish, dogfish, banana slugs, iron fireplaces, axes, and deer skeletons—Wired magazine seemed an effete, puerile invader, deserving of banishment from my analog island.orcas_seaweed_teepee.jpg

Instead, I went to the Orcas Island public library and got a copy of Wuthering Heights. Good, timeless human angst and agony, still powerful after 200 years. In the final two days I finished off Jay Mcinerney’s Ransom, a solid read with particular appeal to Japan buffs like me. And as the August days waned, I came closer than I care to admit to buying a boat and spending the next six months cruising the San Juans with fishing tackle and a sleeping bag.

Back in Portland, I reluctantly switched on the PC, took one look at my desk, and immediately saw two acute problems. Here’s a picture: Can you see what’s wrong?

desk.jpg

The problems with my desk are subtle but serious, and I’m going to fix them ASAP. Here they are:

1. Role confusion
This is a honkin’ big desk, measuring 80 inches long by 36 inches deep. For a computer station, it’s far bigger than it needs to be. That’s because it’s designed for analog work—for spreading out papers and books, for thinking and writing by hand. Yet it’s dominated by computer crap that makes such “spreading out” impractical. It needs to return to its true mission in life as an analog work desk.

2. Telephone presence
What’s that about? The presence of a telephone assumes constant sitting at this computer station/desk throughout the day. This is a dreadful violation of several of Clark’s Rules (though great if you want to be a constantly swamped office worker).

pepper_on_beach.jpgApprehending these problems, I immediately got on the phone with Harris Work Systems to arrange the purchase of a new, separate computer workstation, substantially smaller than my main desk (BTW, this will be a motorized workstation—when it arrives I’ll show a picture and explain the ergonomic advantages). My honkin’ big desk, sans computer, will return to its proper purpose, in a new and honored location in my office.

So thanks, Orcas Island, for the analog injection—and for the hint on better coping with an all-too wired world.

You may also enjoy:

How to Be Late for Dinner

Fixing a Broken Work Model

Happiness is Turning Off the Computer

Subscribe to Soul Shelter

commonsensical_book_pshrink35.JPG (This is an installment of CommonSensical, a periodic feature in which we offer timeless words from thinkers and artists new and old on the subject of the soul.)

The odds were against John Keats from the beginning. Orphaned as a small child, he grew up in poverty, had a scattershot education, nurtured an ill-fated love for a woman he couldn’t win, was savaged by critics in his native England, and died unknown to the world at age twenty-five.

But Keats left behind a slim body of poetry that includes some of the most beautiful lyrical works in the English language. His poetic mastery is often cited as being second only to Shakespeare.

Keats’s correspondence is full of riches as well. In May 1819, eighteen months before keats_poetry_book_pshrink30.JPGfatally succumbing to tuberculosis, the twenty-four-year-old poet sent his brother an astonishing letter outlining his philosophy about the human soul. I first read this letter more than a decade ago and have revisited it a few times a year ever since. Keats’s life-affirming perspective always touches me.

The letter seems a natural thing to share on a blog about the soul, for Keats is talking here about the big themes that all of us, by virtue of being alive, must explore: the meaning of life and death; of joy and sorrow; the conflict between fate and freewill; and the nature of identity. In short, he’s talking about the quest of existence itself.

Call the world, if you please, “The Vale of Soul-Making.” Then you find out the use of the world… I say “Soul-Making” — Soul as distinguished from Intelligence. There may be Intelligence, or sparks of the divinity, in millions, but they are not Souls till they acquire Identities, till each one is personally itself.

How then are Souls to be made? How then are these sparks…to have Identity given to them, so as ever to possess a bliss peculiar to each one’s individual existence? How, but by the medium of a world like this? This point I sincerely wish to consider because I think it is a grander system of salvation than the Christian religion, or rather it is a system of Spirit-creation.

Now Keats takes up a vivid analogy to explore how a unique soul comes to be formed in a world where one is often at the mercy of uncontrollable circumstance.

It’s particularly moving to reflect that the young man writing these words has led a very difficult life, has long been haunted by the conviction that he will die young — and yet, rather than say “no” to life, has opened himself to the troubles and wonders of the heart, and seeks to create art of lasting beauty.

… I will call the world a School instituted for the purpose of teaching little children to read. I will call the human heart the Horn Book used in that school. [Note: a Horn Book was a child’s primer, often covered with a sheet of transparent horn]. And I will call the child able to read the Soul made from that School and its Horn Book. Do you not see how necessary a world of pains and troubles is to school an Intelligence and make it a Soul? A place where the heart must feel and suffer in a thousand diverse ways! Not merely is the heart a Horn Book, it is the mind’s Bible, it is the mind’s experience, it is the teat from which the Mind or Intelligence sucks its Identity. As various as the lives of men are, so various become their souls, and thus does God make individual beings, Souls, Identical Souls [i.e. each possessing identity] of the sparks of his own essence.

This appears to me a faint sketch of a system which does not affront our reason and humanity. I am convinced that many difficulties which Christians labor under would vanish before it.

Keats is saying here what Rilke, another favorite poet of mine, put another way in 1904: “Let life happen to you. Believe me: life is in the right, always.”

johnkeats_pshrink35.JPGAnd noticing that Keats describes a Soul as Intelligence that has acquired an Identity of its own, I think of certain inspiring people I’ve been privileged to know in my life — and of inspiring artists whose works never cease to amaze me. These people, and these artists, have a kind of indescribable soulfulness that sets them apart. Unique, wise, humble, and generous, they enrich my life beyond measure. Keats would suggest that these people have such life-enhancing soulfulness to share because they have experienced the world openheartedly.

Now the poet sums up:

Man was formed by circumstances, and what are circumstances but touchstones of his heart? And what are touchstones but provings of his heart? And what are provings of his heart but fortifiers or alterers of his nature? And what is his altered nature but his Soul? And what was his Soul before it came into the world and had these provings and alterations and perfectionings? An Intelligence, without Identity. And how is this Identity to be made? Through the medium of the heart. And how is the heart to become this medium but in a world of circumstances?

Fate is fickle, life unpredictable, but one is here now, and there’s lots of living to be done.

You might also enjoy:

The Heroic Journey

Time for Everything

Opting Out of the Deferred Life Plan

Subscribe to Soul Shelter

office_workers.gifStaying swamped at work is essential for upwardly mobile office professionals. Remember, if you want to be a success, constant activity is a must!

So for the tiny handful of you who haven’t yet thrown off the antiquated shackles of analog worklife, here are some guidelines for keeping busy, busy, busy in the wired workforce of the twenty-first century.

1. Sit in Front of Your Computer All Day
Your computer is the ultimate source of productivity, so don’t leave it unattended. Ignore nonsense about so-called “offline” work. Forget “ergonomic” claptrap about repetitive stress injuries, eyestrain, etc. And remember: Rest breaks are for wimps.

2. Make E-Mail the Center of Your Worklife
The modern office worker’s ultimate goal is to work entirely by passing e-mail messages back and forth. Work diligently toward this ideal (see Rules 3 through 7).

3. Check E-Mail First Thing in the Morning and Constantly Throughout the Day
Start each workday by checking e-mail. Leave your e-mail program open, and set it to automatically check for incoming messages every two minutes. This way you can respond immediately to the exciting and important information each new communication brings (pay special attention to software upgrade announcements, Facebook invitations, and jokes from relatives). This is called “multitasking.”

4. Multitask
Avoid focusing on a single task until it’s done—that’s for Luddites unable to embrace new technology and the modern workstyle. Wired workers multitask constantly. They jump effortlessly from task to task—and create entirely new tasks with every arriving e-mail message.

5. React, Don’t Think
Reflection, pondering, deliberation, and contemplation are for squares stuck in the 1900s. Wired workers don’t think, they react. Respond immediately to each and every e-mail message, regardless of its so-called “importance.”

6. Check the Web Constantly
Clicking through to URLs referenced in e-mail messages is the second most important task of the modern worker. “Bookmark” important sites and check them continuously for updates. To understand how crucial this is, just imagine what would happen if you didn’t check your bookmarks constantly.

7. Carry a Mobile E-Mail Device
For those rare occasions when you must leave your PC, carry a mobile device so you can respond to crucial e-mail messages and do important Web research. Use your mobile device during meetings, at lunch, and especially when you’re with your family.

8. Type, Don’t Talkoffice_logooffice.gif
Modern office workers know typing is more effective than talking. Why arrange lunch in an eight-second phone call when you can stretch the discussion over hours and multiple e-mail messages? Typing not only keeps you busier, it helps you avoid live encounters involving such passé elements of communication as tone of voice, facial expression, body language, physical proximity, eye contact, and so forth. C’mon, people, this isn’t the 1800s!

9. Avoid Pencil and Paper, Draft in Digital
Never go offline or off-site with pencil and paper to “think” about what you want to say (hey, they don’t call it “Office” for nothing). Start typing and pasting in cool images. It’ll all make sense once it’s formatted.

10. Do Fun Tasks First
Work on fun tasks first (assuming you’re caught up with e-mail, which shouldn’t happen often). Ignore the CRAP™ rule. Leave difficult work for later. This’ll ensure that you’re constantly swamped and enable you to check your mobile device late into the evening hours.

Follow these simple steps and you, too, can stay swamped on the path to success!

Happiness is Turning Off the Computer

The Perils of the Internet

Want to Achieve Your Goal? Avoid E-Mail!

Subscribe to Soul Shelter